Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

ITeam+Forward withdraws Athena Drive lot-consolidation plan after neighbor raises concerns about springs and septic disclosures

Salem Township Board of Supervisors · September 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After detailed conditional language for final approval was read into the record, ITeam+Forward submitted a written withdrawal of its Athena Drive lot-consolidation plan. Resident Eric Hageder alleged the company and its engineer misrepresented on-site features, claiming a spring and spring house existed; the Board accepted the withdrawal and removed the item from the agenda.

The Board read a set of proposed conditions for final approval of the ITeam+Forward lot-consolidation plan for Athena Drive, including requirements to identify springs or watercourses, to specify structures and demolition timetables, and to clarify septic and well connections for the new single-family home. Later in the meeting the Board accepted a written request from JT Hodil withdrawing the plan.

Resident Eric Hageder asserted that the applicant and its engineer had been dishonest about the property's contents: he said they "have been lying about the contents of the property for eight months" and reported that an adjacent owner told the township there is a spring house and spring. Solicitor Falatovich noted attorney-client privilege applies to some supervisor–attorney correspondence and said that identifying watercourses had been part of the removed agenda motion. The Board accepted the withdrawal unanimously; the withdrawal leaves open the possibility of future separate sewage-permit actions by the property owner if replacement sanitary systems are needed.

The withdrawn plan had included a number of substantive conditions (demolition timeline, conversion to a single three-bedroom home, septic and well changes and a required note that the new system would serve only a new single-family home). With the withdrawal, the Board removed the item from further action at that meeting and directed that the withdrawal notice be circulated to interested parties.