Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Federal Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Hulsey frames legislation setting procedures for state challenges to federal actions
Summary
Representative Hulsey presented HB2016 to establish pathways for state-level challenges when federal actions are deemed unconstitutional, citing historic court decisions and proposing procedures for governors, judges, legislators, local governments or citizen petitions; the subcommittee voted to advance the bill.
Representative Hulsey used constitutional history and court precedents to explain HB2016, a bill describing processes the state could use if it seeks to take action in response to federal statutes or executive actions it considers unconstitutional. Hulsey repeatedly emphasized the measure does not force nullification; rather, it sets out five possible avenues for state action, including petitions from local governments or registered voters.
Hulsey cited Marbury v. Madison, Norton v. Shelby County and other authorities in support of the claim that state remedies exist when federal action exceeds constitutional bounds. Committee members acknowledged the presentation as a history lesson; after brief discussion and a previous-question motion, the clerk recorded 4 ayes and 1 present/not voting and HB2016 was sent to full committee.
