Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Privacy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bill to shield immigration-enforcement officers’ personal details advances despite transparency concerns

Public Service Subcommittee · March 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Chairman Howell told a subcommittee that House Bill 2506 would keep names, home addresses, contact information and operational details of officers involved in immigration enforcement confidential; members raised concerns about including federal agents after reported federal operations. The measure was sent to full committee.

House Bill 2506, sponsored and explained by Chairman Howell, would make personal identifying details and specific operational information about officers involved in immigration enforcement confidential. Howell said the measure is intended to protect officer safety and operational integrity and includes exceptions for court orders and lawful information sharing.

"It requires that the names, home addresses, contact information, and other personal, identifying details of federal, state, and local officers involved in immigration enforcement remain confidential," Chairman Howell told the committee while urging a positive vote. He said the draft is carefully crafted to penalize unlawful activity by officers while protecting those carrying out lawful enforcement.

Representative Salinas pressed the sponsor on including federal agents, citing a report about federal operations in Nashville and saying some federal agents "were marking people on their arms saying we're going hunting for immigration enforcement." Salinas said Tennesseans deserve transparency about how money is spent and expressed concern about broad confidentiality that would include federal personnel.

Representative Warner asked whether the bill pertains only to illegal immigration; the sponsor said the bill "does not address illegal immigration" but is confined to protecting identities of officers involved in immigration enforcement and includes explicit exceptions for court orders and lawful information sharing.

After discussion, the committee voted to advance the bill to full committee (5 ayes, 1 no).