Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electric Vehicles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates EV language; agrees to 'evaluate vehicle options' and regional approach to chargers
Summary
Members disagreed about whether to include electric-vehicle promotion in the EEP. After debating costs and truck limitations, the commission agreed to remove prescriptive EV promotion and instead evaluate fuel-efficient vehicle options for municipal replacements and the town's role in a regional EV network.
The commission spent substantial time debating language about electric vehicles in the Enhanced Energy Plan. Committee member (speaker 2) proposed wording recognizing broader adoption of hybrids and EVs; Chair (speaker 3) and others objected to normative language and urged the plan not to "promote" EVs locally.
Members cited practical concerns for large municipal vehicles, charging-time limits in storms and a claimed installation cost of $3,000,000 for charging infrastructure. The group agreed to change the plan to direct evaluation of fuel-efficient municipal-vehicle options at replacement and to add text that Timnouth does not currently appear to be an appropriate siting location for a regional EV fast-charging hub but will work with utilities and regional partners if conditions change.
