Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents ask who will enforce ATV rules as proponents promise registration and decals

Tinmouth Select Board · July 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Neighbors pressed proponents and a local enforcement speaker on limited police hours, potential increased enforcement costs and practical tools (decals, game cameras, plates) to identify violators; proponents emphasized club self‑policing and sheriff backup.

Multiple residents raised enforcement capacity as a central concern during the informational session. Doug Inkley, who said he lives on Wright's Road, said ATVs are currently not permitted there and described erosion and trespass. "I'm Doug Inkley, and ATVs are not permitted on that road nor any other town roads at this point in time," he said, asking presenters to confirm trails would not be included and to explain how violations would be handled.

Proponents said registration, club decals and mandatory state stickers would make machines identifiable and easier to enforce; proponents also suggested using game cameras and reporting plate numbers to the sheriff. Dave Fox, who spoke from an enforcement perspective, said his experience in neighboring towns shows limited routine problems and emphasized that local club membership and visible identification make self‑policing more feasible: "So you're gonna police yourselves for the most part." Residents countered that the town's limited policing hours and enforcement budget could require additional resources if use expands.

Speakers did not specify new enforcement funding; multiple residents urged the selectboard to consider budget implications before adopting an ordinance. The selectboard and proponents agreed to provide the written draft in advance so the community can assess enforcement language and potential costs in detail before the November vote.