Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Holcomb Bridge 8483 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council defers Holcomb Bridge rezoning after small‑business opposition
Summary
Council deferred consideration of rezoning request RZ 24‑012 and variance BC 24‑009 for 8483 Holcomb Bridge Road (proposed Dutch Brothers drive‑through) to Sept. 22, 2025, after public opposition from the existing on‑site business and questions about leases and traffic. Applicant requested the deferral to resolve leasing and site sequencing issues.
The Johns Creek City Council voted to defer action on rezoning request RZ 24‑012 and concurrent variance BC 24‑009 for 8483 Holcomb Bridge Road until the Sept. 22, 2025 council meeting.
Director Song presented the case: the proposal would demolish existing structures at the site and construct a 950‑square‑foot Dutch Brothers drive‑through with a 337‑square‑foot covered outdoor patio, a single pickup window and internal stacking for up to 15 vehicles. Staff noted buffers, sidewalks, internal signage and that Fulton County confirmed adequate water and sewer capacity. Staff recommended approval with conditions; the planning commission had recommended approval at its March 4 hearing.
Applicant counsel Alex Brock asked for a deferral, saying Dutch Brothers is sequencing sites nationally and that recent information received May 28 revealed lease/relocation questions with the existing emissions testing tenant. Several nearby small‑business owners, including owner Michael Tran and his wife Tip Tran, spoke in opposition and said the rezoning would jeopardize a long‑established, family‑run business that provides community donations and employs local workers. The Trans said they had not been contacted by the property owner’s leasing office and urged the council to consider the human impact of displacement.
Council members asked questions about the site plan, stacking and whether a traffic study was required; staff said the estimated trips (presented by staff) did not trigger a separate traffic study (staff cited roughly 350 daily trips, 80 AM peak and 30 PM peak). After discussion about notice to the tenant and the limits of zoning to resolve lease issues, Councilmember Skinner moved to defer the item to Sept. 22, 2025; Councilmember Elwood seconded and the motion passed on a voice vote. Staff and the applicant were directed to continue conversations with the tenant and provide updated information at the deferred hearing.
