Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Quasi Judicial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff reviews variance findings, ex parte rules and ethics requirements for quasi-judicial hearings
Summary
Staff walked members through required variance findings (unique, non-self-created hardship; minimum necessary relief), the competent-substantial-evidence standard, ex parte disclosure rules, and ethics constraints including gift limits and conflict disclosures.
Corina Maldonado and city legal staff reviewed procedures and standards that govern quasi-judicial hearings. Maldonado outlined that decisions must be based on competent substantial evidence and noted that staff reports often supply that evidence; legal staff explained that if board members disagree with staff they must put alternative evidence on the record to support a reversal.
Legal staff also covered ex parte (expert) communications rules, conflict-of-interest and gift limitations (gifts over $100 must be reported), and the need to file financial-disclosure forms when required. Staff warned that communications related to official duties are public records and recommended members contact staff in advance if they expect a potential conflict.
