Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning & Zoning board recommends narrower special-area‑plan rules, removes RM‑40 from draft ordinance
Summary
The North Bay Village Planning & Zoning Board voted 4–1 to send a revised SAP ordinance recommendation to the village commission that removes RM‑40 from the proposal, raises the RM‑70 site‑area threshold and increases required civic space and waterfront open‑space dedication.
The Planning & Zoning Board voted to recommend a revised special area plan (SAP) ordinance that would expand SAPs beyond the T6 transit zone but exclude RM‑40 from the new rules and tighten eligibility and benefit requirements for larger multifamily parcels. The motion—approved 4–1 on roll call—directs staff to move forward with a package that keeps RM‑70 in the ordinance but raises its minimum qualifying land area to 3 contiguous acres, increases the civic‑space requirement to 10% and retains a 12,500‑square‑foot waterfront public‑open‑space requirement for any RM‑70 application seeking height above 312 feet.
Board members and staff debated several technical elements of the draft before the vote, including whether SAPs should require purchasing TDRs for height bonuses, how site plans tie to SAP approvals and whether properties across a street should count as contiguous. Staff said the draft moves SAP rules into a new section of the unified land‑development code and adds explicit procedural steps, including a requirement that applicants hold a community meeting before public hearings. As Sylvia (staff) explained, “any applicant that's seeking SAP approval is going to host at least 1 community meeting to explain the development proposal and the application.”
Opponents on the board said lowering minimum acreage in the earlier draft risked enabling taller buildings on small lots and could have adverse effects on single‑family neighborhoods. One board member objected that the SAP process “has been a tool for manipulation, and they make me so uncomfortable,” arguing the city should preserve stricter limits on where bonuses apply. Proponents countered that the SAP process gives the village leverage to secure waterfront open space, parks and traffic mitigation that the underlying zoning does not guarantee.
The board did not finalize every drafting detail: members asked staff to clarify whether third‑party resale of TDRs would preserve height bonuses and to add a clearer definition of “contiguous” in the code. Staff said those items will be resolved as the commission considers the recommendation.
