Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission agrees to use bullet-point RFQ criteria, holds off on publishing weights
Summary
Commissioners discussed whether to publish weighted percentages for RFQ evaluation. They agreed to use bullet-point criteria (experience, quality, qualifications, implementation plan, projected expenses, references) and to check with legal counsel before releasing any weighted scoring.
Commissioners debated whether to attach specific percentage weights to evaluation criteria for upcoming RFQs or to rely on point-based scoring; they agreed to use bullet-point criteria without publishing fixed percentages now.
A commissioner (Speaker 3) asked whether the panel should use "percentage or by points, maximum allowable points" for evaluations. The chair (Speaker 5) and others said they preferred the simpler approach of posting evaluation criteria as bullet points and leaving percentages off unless legal requirements force publication. The chair said they would "double check with Ken about percentages" and suggested the criteria should emphasize experience, quality, qualifications, implementation plan, projected expenses and references.
Members discussed the tradeoff between transparency and procurement flexibility, with one commissioner saying the rubric could be shared after decisions are made. The commission asked staff to bullet-point the criteria for posting and to consult legal counsel about whether percentages are required by law.
