Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Private Partnerships topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears proposal for Boring Company tunnels to Nashville airport; members press for clarity on risks and long-term obligations

Tennessee House Transportation Committee · February 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Nashville airport leaders described a proposed agreement with the Boring Company to build two 8'9-mile tunnels linking the city and airport at no up-front cost to authorities; some committee members urged caution, asking who would bear long-term maintenance and whether contract clawbacks protect public interests.

Committee members questioned airport leaders about a proposed long-term agreement with the Boring Company to build two tunnels between Nashville and the airport. Doug Krillin said a letter of intent was expected at an upcoming airport authority meeting and described a structure where the company would build, operate and maintain the tunnels and pay the airport license and trip fees: "...we have been negotiating with the boring company for several months now...they would construct a final agreement...they would build it, operate it, and maintain it."

Representative Bain pressed for safeguards and asked who would shoulder long-term maintenance or capital-replacement obligations and whether the agreement includes clawback provisions if the project fails to meet obligations. "Are we investing in durable public goods or are we underwriting a private tech venture?" Bain asked. Krillin responded that no taxpayer or airport authority dollars are being used to build the tunnel and that operational risk rests with the company; he said the airport could repurpose the rented property if the operator stopped service. Committee members requested clarity on contract language and long-term protections before any broader public-asset commitments.