Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Disciplinary Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board proposes $5,000 penalty for pharmacy that operated without pharmacist in charge; split vote recorded

Maine Board of Pharmacy · January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Pharmacy moved to schedule 2025-PHA-21052 for an adjudicatory hearing and offer a Consent Agreement including a warning and a $5,000 civil penalty described as $1,200 per week the pharmacy operated without a Pharmacist in Charge; the minutes record McCormack in favor and Kane opposed.

The Maine Board of Pharmacy on Jan. 8 recorded a motion to schedule matter 2025-PHA-21052 for an adjudicatory hearing and to offer a Consent Agreement that includes a warning and a $5,000 civil penalty described in the minutes as $1,200 per week the pharmacy operated without a Pharmacist in Charge.

The minutes specifically record that McCormack voted in favor and that President Edward Kane opposed that action; three members were listed as absent in the vote line. The board's recorded motion and the yardstick for the civil penalty are entered into the draft minutes; the motion instructs staff to proceed with hearing scheduling and consent-agreement preparation.

The penalty description in the minutes ties the $5,000 amount to a weekly calculation ($1,200 per week). The minutes do not include further narrative from the licensee or a statement from board counsel on alternative sanctions. The matter is scheduled for adjudication and any final disposition would be reflected in a future board action or approved consent agreement.