Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter urges clearer, annual steps in weed‑abatement resolution
Summary
A written public comment read at the meeting said the draft resolution lacks information about future board action, publication of noncompliant parcel lists, contractor use and billing procedures; the board's counsel said the process is statutory and public.
A member of the public identified in the record as Crosby asked the board to add implementation details to the draft weed‑abatement resolution so property owners and the public would know what would happen in future years.
Crosby read a written comment: “The draft resolution 32 dash 20 26 before you today is lacking information about what the board about what board action is needed in subsequent years to authorize the district to abate hazardous weeds and rubbish on private property at the owner's expense,” and urged that an annual updated list of noncompliant parcels, a description of planned steps (including intent to mail notices under code 14900.6), contractor use and the billing procedure be made public at a board meeting.
Legal counsel Hirsch responded that the district follows a statutory annual process and that the resolution attaches parcel numbers; he recommended handling a recital date correction in the motion rather than inserting a step‑by‑step implementation schedule into the resolution text. The board adopted the resolution with a corrected recital date and closed the hearing.
