Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Skatepark Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Community Council pledges funds; CCSD directs counsel to draft skatepark funding agreement

Cambria Community Services District Board of Directors · July 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a years‑long campaign, the Cambria Community Council pledged construction and contingency funds to close the remaining Cambria Skatepark funding gap; the board directed district counsel to draft a funding agreement for review by both boards before contracting.

The Cambria Community Services District board on July 13 directed district counsel to prepare a skatepark funding agreement after the Cambria Community Council pledged to provide the remaining construction shortfall and a 15% contingency. General Manager McElhaney earlier told the board the lowest responsive construction bid for the Cambria Skatepark was $1,344,000 and staff reported available project funding at roughly $1.68–1.69 million, leaving a funding shortfall estimated at about $170,000–$175,000 before construction contingencies.

A Community Council representative (SEG 1412) outlined available funds: a maintenance account ($69,312), a construction set‑aside ($623,000) and other investment income, and said the council will move donor funds and investment income to cover the remaining shortfall and the proposed 15% contingency (~$201,600). Vice President Dean moved — and the board seconded — a motion directing counsel to draft a funding agreement in coordination with the Community Council and an ad hoc board committee (President Farmer and Vice President Dean); the motion passed by unanimous roll call.

District counsel Carmel described the next steps: staff and counsel will negotiate deal points with the Community Council, prepare a draft funding agreement for both parties' legal review, present the agreement to both boards (likely a special meeting) and then, if approved, agendize the construction contract for formal award (target: August meeting). Community speakers at the meeting praised the pledge and urged the board to move forward; speakers also asked for clarity on contingency calculations and bidder fairness if the project were rebid.