Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dorset residents press board over Raptor Lane housing proposal
Summary
After a White & Burke presentation of a concept for Raptor Lane, residents and abutters pressed the Select Board on water, stormwater, traffic, environmental impacts, project scale and financing; the board said further public sessions and a market study will follow.
White & Burke and consultant SM Graves presented a concept for housing at the Raptor Lane property and answered nearly two hours of questions from residents and online participants. Brian Pine of White & Burke reviewed the town's process dating to 2018 and Scott Graves described his team's concept; Town Manager Rob Gaiotti said White & Burke solicited more than 60 firms and that four firms attended the site visit but only SM Graves submitted a written response to the RFP.
"White & Burke solicited over 60 development firms in Vermont and the region with the RFP," Rob Gaiotti said during the meeting, describing the outreach and selection process. Residents pushed back on several fronts: abutters asked about stormwater, groundwater and drinking-water impacts and were told any project would need state stormwater permits, pump testing of wells and septic/soil analyses; others called for a market-study to define feasible unit types.
Some speakers questioned the basic premise of subsidizing land and infrastructure. Don Heaton said the plan looked like "a giveaway of land by the Town," and Peter Thompson asked why the town would cede control of Owl's Head access to a developer rather than selling the property at fair market value. Town staff replied that subsidizing land and infrastructure is the mechanism that can enable lower-priced units; selling the land at market value, staff said, would typically make cross-subsidized affordable units infeasible.
Financing questions focused on whether new home taxes would service infrastructure debt. The board explained use of Vermont's CHIP program, which can apply future property-tax revenue from new homes to repay bonds for infrastructure so the town's general fund is not directly tapped. Participants also asked about school and emergency-service impacts, traffic (including whether VTrans would require a signal), and environmental clearing; staff said impacts will depend on the final scope and that engineers and state agencies would review traffic and natural-resource issues.
The Graves concept outlined up to 125 units phased over 10—12 years and a concept valuation above $60 million, but Rob Gaiotti emphasized that the plan is conceptual and that unit count, financing details and exact design remain undecided. The board scheduled at least two more public sessions (Jan. 21 and Feb. 18) to gather input and said a housing-market study is likely to be commissioned to determine feasible unit types and price points.
