Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regulatory Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hooksett planning board approves parking minimum revisions and occupancy/landscaping rule changes
Summary
The board approved parking standard edits (including conforming to a new state law setting one minimum parking space per residential unit) and voted to adopt amendments clarifying when occupancy reviews trigger full landscaping/performance-zone standards; votes carried with recorded oppositions on some items.
Get email alerts on the Regulatory Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During a consolidated public‑hearing session the planning board approved multiple development‑regulation edits affecting parking, manhole placement and occupancy/landscaping standards.
Planner explained that state law now limits residential minimum parking to one space per dwelling unit; the board revised local language accordingly and adopted a related housekeeping change that lets community‑development staff determine the closest similar use for occupancy reviews in some cases. The board read a public letter from resident Sam Danforth urging broader reductions in parking requirements for environmental and land‑use reasons; members noted the letter’s arguments but observed that the state change drives the immediate edits.
The board also approved an amendment allowing sewer manholes to be placed within the paved roadway (with waiver options for exceptions), a change staff said improves maintenance access. On occupancy review and landscaping, the board adopted clarifying language that ties ‘‘land use proposal’’ to a statutory notion of a substantially different use or dimensional change; members debated the extent to which parking‑lot changes or removal of landscaping should trigger full performance‑zone review and asked staff to consult legal counsel if necessary.
Votes on the package passed in multiple motions. The planner said additional fine‑tuning or later amendments could be considered, and the board encouraged staff to circulate final language and run any legal questions by counsel before implementation.
