Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tif Challenge topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Winfield district board hears update on TIF 2 legal challenge
Summary
Board members were briefed on a regional legal challenge to the Village of Winfield's TIF 2, arguing the district fails statutory "blight" and "but-for" tests and improperly aggregates non-contiguous parcels; the board agreed to monitor the case and noted a recent related judgment.
The Winfield School District 34 Board of Education received an update on legal challenges to the Village of Winfield's Tax Increment Financing district known as TIF 2 during the public presentation portion of its March 26 meeting. The board was told that the school districts argue the TIF fails to meet statutory criteria, including a required showing of blight and proper geographic contiguity, and that the municipal spending plan will not significantly expand the tax base for other taxing bodies.
According to the update presented to the board, a central concern is that the village combined several non-contiguous parcels, including a parking garage, to form TIF 2; the districts say that practice is improper and that the garage would remain on the tax rolls for only 20 years, reducing long-term tax revenues to schools. The districts also contend the required "but-for" showing is weak because substantial private investment, notably a $65—$70 million project by Central DuPage Hospital, is already driving development.
The board was informed there has been a recent judgment in a related case and that the matter may proceed to higher courts; board materials noted the potential for statewide implications. The district's materials and presentation framed the position as a legal challenge brought by the school districts, and the board acknowledged it will continue to monitor developments and consult counsel as needed.
No formal motion or vote on litigation strategy was taken at the open meeting; the update was informational. The board discussed the potential fiscal impact on future tax revenues, but the presentation did not identify a specific dollar estimate attributable to TIF 2 in the district's materials.
