Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter asks board for clarity on student–teacher ratios and strategic planning costs
Summary
A member of the public asked trustees for secondary student–teacher ratios (and certified vs. non-certified splits), questioned whether instructional assistants are counted in ratios, and asked for transparency on a previously funded strategic-planning contract estimated in the transcript at roughly $50,000–$100,000.
Get email alerts on the Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the public-comment portion of the Monroe Public Schools meeting, a community member raised questions about class-size reporting and the district’s strategic planning contract.
"I wanted to focus a little bit on the student teacher ratio... I just wanted to make sure that that's not part of the math," the commenter said, asking specifically whether instructional assistants or coaches were being included in the elementary ratios. The commenter also asked for secondary-level ratio data, split between certified and non-certified staff, and for an update on a strategic-planning engagement the board previously funded (the commenter recalled the cost as somewhere between $50,000 and $100,000).
Superintendent Shaw and board members acknowledged the request and said staff would research the precise ratio calculations and provide follow-up. The board did not provide the secondary-ratio breakdown or final strategic-planning status during the meeting.
