Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Home Business Cup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Neighbors object to proposed Kitzman dock/lift business; commission approves CUP with conditions limiting retail and visibility

Crow Wing County Planning Commission · March 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After substantial public comment opposing a proposed dock/lift home business on Pelican Lake (noise, visual clutter, traffic and survey disputes), the commission approved a conditional‑use permit with conditions including no on‑site retail/customers, limits on visible outdoor storage along County Road 11, and requirements for septic compliance and screening.

The planning commission approved a conditional‑use permit for Jason and Rainey Kitzman to operate a dock‑and‑lift business from their Pelican Lake property, adding conditions to address neighbors' concerns about noise, outdoor storage and traffic. The decision followed an extended public‑comment period in which nearby residents urged denial or strict limits.

Neighbors described long‑running problems with outdoor storage visible from County Road 11, noise from sanding and grinding, concerns about septic compliance, and a disputed property line. Donna Sutton, one neighbor, told the board: "I strongly oppose Kitzman's operating an industrial dock lift storage and sales business on his property next to mine," citing noise and safety concerns. Jason Kitzman said much of the equipment up at the shop is insurance‑related damage awaiting disposition and that the busiest windows are seasonal; he described typical staffing as three to four employees meeting at the shop and leaving by barge.

To address testimony, the board approved the CUP with 13 conditions prepared by staff: limiting units to rental/lease (not for sale), prohibiting on‑site retail/customers, disallowing manufacturing and retail sales from the parcel, requiring screening and a stormwater/erosion plan, and ensuring septic compliance (including a winter‑window inspection). The applicant accepted those conditions and confirmed he understood that customers would not be allowed to come to the property for retail purchases under the CUP.