Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents raise road, stormwater and boundary concerns over proposed Rockland Stone quarry
Summary
During the June 11 hearing on Rockland Stone’s quarry CUP, several residents asked whether county roads (Road 130) would be used, how the creek and stormwater would be affected, and requested clearer boundary and economic‑impact information; the board required studies and capped truck trips.
Opponents at the Lyon County Planning & Appeals Board hearing on June 11 pressed Rockland Stone and staff for more detail on traffic routing, water impacts and economic effects.
Brandon Thompson asked whether an alternate route would be used or if Road 130 would carry quarry traffic, and he asked what effect quarrying would have on the creek and stormwater. Mark Remmert asked for clarification on the quarry boundaries, whether crushing would occur, what Road & Bridge had reported and called for more accurate information about economic impacts. John Ingold said he was worried about road usage and travel safety.
In response, applicant representatives said an alternate route in Chase County exists and estimated about "10 Trucks per week." The board and staff did not hear a technical stormwater analysis during the hearing and required that “all studies required by law” be completed before final permitting. The board included conditions intended to address concerns: compliance with Section 7.17 (Quarry Regulations), a letter from the State Historical Society, subcontractor insurance proof, a cap on truck trips (no more than 15 per week), completion of required studies and a $2 million liability policy.
The record shows community questions about routing and environmental impacts remain unresolved pending the studies and any conditions the Board of County Commissioners may impose.
