Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs moving some reviews to administrative approvals to cut delays
Summary
Weathersfield's planning staff proposed more administrative approvals — with engineering review where needed — to reduce DRB hearings and speed permitting; commissioners discussed completeness standards and potential limits to that approach.
Land Use Administrator Ryan Gumbart told the commission he wants to reduce administrative time demands by allowing engineering review and approval under specific parameters so more permits could be approved administratively rather than referred to the Development Review Board (DRB). Gumbart said the change was intended to "allow for more administrative approvals to streamline permitting processes and avoid the need for DRB hearings."
Commissioners pressed on how the DRB trigger would be set and emphasized applications must be complete before hearings to avoid delays. Chair Brian Bosenberg said a permanent, one-page cheat sheet would help staff and applicants follow the new order of operations and measurable standards Gumbart proposed so only projects that clearly exceeded those standards would be routed to the DRB.
