Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents raise road and bridge concerns; commission re‑tables rock‑quarry application
Summary
Application Q2025‑01 for an agricultural conditional‑use 'rock quarry' by US Stone was re‑tabled after residents raised concerns about road use and bridge weight limits; commissioners said US Stone had not responded to questions.
The commission brought Application Q2025‑01 (a request for an agricultural conditional‑use 'rock quarry' by Ben Retter, US Stone) back to the table on June 12 for discussion and then re‑tabled it after further resident comment and unanswered questions from the applicant. Planning staff (Sam Seeley) and Road & Bridge personnel reviewed proposed road use; residents Mark Remmert and John Ingold expressed concerns about safety on suggested roads and existing bridge weight limits. Counsel Monte Miller noted US Stone had not appeared to address questions raised by the commission.
The minutes record motions to bring the item back to the table and then to re‑table it; both motions recorded passed 3‑0 (Duft/Bartel). No final substantive decision on the quarry application was made at the meeting.
