Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Staffing Stabilization topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

West Linn faces multi-year general-fund gap; council weighs fees, levy and phased staffing

West Linn City Council (work session) · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff warned the five-year forecast shows a structural general-fund deficit that could require service cuts unless the council offsets roughly $2 million or more via fees, a renewing levy, or other tools; proposals included a parks fee (~$5/month) and targeted police staffing increases.

Staff told the council the city’s five-year projection shows a material general-fund gap that, if unaddressed, would force service reductions; staff characterized it as a multi-year problem that could cause the city to 'dip below reserves' in later budget cycles. To avoid cuts, staff proposed an array of tools including increasing the parks-maintenance fee (estimated at about $5/month to cover roughly $500,000 in parks shortfall) and pursuing a renewing operating levy or targeted fees for public safety and other services.

Police leadership described current overtime pressures and framed a staffing request as a service-stabilization need: the police representative said a minimum of three additional patrol officers is required to reduce mandatory overtime and maintain service levels; an additional patrol officer cost was estimated at roughly $240,000/year including salary, benefits and equipment. Staff presented a consolidated scenario in which fully funding the package and $2 million in stabilization would equal an approximate $43/month increase per utility customer to raise about $4.6M/year — a significant rate effect that councilors said would require careful phasing and communication.

Council direction: pursue a phased mix of tools — targeted fees to address near-term gaps and a considered outreach/polling plan for any levy — and return with packaging and timelines that minimize rate shock and explain uses of funds to voters.