Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waterfront Vision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council flags waterfront vision but flags remediation limits on non-city land
Summary
The council discussed funding approaches for the waterfront vision and the need to monitor remediation opportunities for contaminated 'sludge ponds,' noting DEQ responsibility for cleanup of parcels not owned by the city.
Staff reminded council that the waterfront vision will be up for consideration the following night and that waterfront-area projects lack specific cost definitions; they recommended separating waterfront investments from general parks acquisition for discussion. Councilors identified potential funding sources such as urban renewal/TIF and grants but emphasized scoping and coordination with property owners.
Councilors raised environmental and liability concerns around the ponds and noted that remediation responsibilities for some properties lie with the Department of Environmental Quality rather than the city. One councilor urged pursuing grant funding "to remediate the toxic sludge ponds," while others noted the city owns little property in the waterfront district and that acquisition opportunities should be prioritized if they arise.
Council direction: scope waterfront projects, coordinate zoning/vision steps (including potential comp-plan or zoning changes), and pursue grant opportunities where appropriate. Staff will brief the council during the formal waterfront-vision item on the next meeting agenda.
