Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs prepayment of impact fees to speed infrastructure versus taxpayer risk
Summary
Some council members favored allowing developers to prepay impact fees at recordation to fund infrastructure earlier; others warned prepaid money could force the city into costly projects if developers fail to build and the city must complete offsite works.
A policy option discussed at length was collecting impact fees at recordation rather than at building permit, potentially allowing the city to build offsite infrastructure sooner. One council member (S1) described a hypothetical: collect impact fees when a large plat records, credit the account over time and use those funds to build needed improvements now, explaining developers were "willing to pay the impact fees at recordation and allow them to expire in 3 to 4 years and have a credit on our account for whatever the new rate is."
Other council members cautioned that prepaid funds could create leverage problems: if a developer prepays and later the city is asked to complete a multi-million-dollar offsite project (examples cited included a $10,000,000 lift station and large wastewater mains), taxpayers could be left covering the remainder. The council discussed safeguards such as limiting prepayment to projects with clear phasing plans, developer guarantees, or restricting the expedited path to commercial projects rather than single-family subdivisions.
