Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the TIA And Developer Costs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councilors question costly TIAs, surveys and front-loaded requirements
Summary
Council members said upfront requirements such as traffic impact analyses and tree surveys can stall or price out lot recordation; staff explained when those studies are required and how impact fees are assessed and recalculated at building permit.
Council members raised detailed complaints about the costs developers face before a lot can be legally recorded. One council member (S1) said the process often forces months of work and "over sometimes 6 figures in money spent" before an applicant even gets a responsive plat. The council noted a typical traffic impact analysis can run up to $50,000, while planners said a standard SCR/tree survey is modest in cost but part of the checklist applicants must often satisfy.
Planning staff (S2) responded that some smaller plats are treated as "minor plats" and can avoid certain studies if services are not being extended, and that staff sometimes waive requirements when the facts support it. The staff also explained that impact fees are assessed based on the plat approval date but collected at building permit, and fees are recalculated at permit if a project's actual use is lower than originally assumed: "we recalculate what was assessed, and we only charge what's actually due," S3 said.
The exchange left the council asking staff to identify which checklist items are state-mandated versus discretionary so the council can consider targeted streamlining while preserving protections for future residents and the utility system.
