Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County hears parks master plan with recommendations for Juniper Hills, Fairgrounds and Fox Canyon study

Jefferson County Board of Commissioners · September 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Consultants from the University of Oregon presented a draft Jefferson County Parks Master Plan recommending new and upgraded facilities at Juniper Hills, Panorama Park and the Fairgrounds, expanded RV/overnight capacity, connectivity improvements and an environmental assessment for the Fox Canyon parcel; staff will accept written comments and move the plan into the public‑hearing process.

University of Oregon consultants and county parks staff presented a draft Parks Master Plan to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners on Sept. 10, outlining an inventory of parks and recreation facilities, community survey results and specific recommendations for county parks and regional connections.

The draft lists about 104 recreation facilities managed across the county and proposes priority actions including new multi‑use tournament infrastructure at Juniper Hills, accessibility and lighting improvements at Panorama Park, RV‑park expansion and multipurpose building upgrades at the Fairgrounds, and an environmental assessment of the Fox Canyon parcel to determine remediation needs before development. Consultants recommended increased engagement with non‑English speaking communities and proposed wildfire mitigation plans for park sites.

Tony Anderson, buildings and grounds director, and the consultants said the plan is intended to be a guiding document that can help the county apply for Oregon State Parks grants, leverage partnerships and set a priority action list. Commissioners asked for language to be broadened in some sport categories (e.g., add courts as well as fields) and were reminded the plan can be updated as needs evolve; staff requested written feedback within a week so the draft can move into the community development public‑hearing process.