Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tresco Denial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tresco land-development application denied as administratively incomplete; supervisors asked to require deed and recorded easement for Plant Road
Summary
The Planning Commission denied completeness for the Tresco submission because it was filed under 'Tresco Companies' rather than owner Tresco Paving Corporation; commissioners also advised that Plant Road (parcel 57-04-00-0-184) must be deeded from Damimo Storage to Tresco Paving Corporation and a recorded easement provided before lot consolidation can proceed.
Solicitor Ryan Thomas and commissioners reviewed the Tresco land-development filings and concluded the application was administratively incomplete because it listed "Tresco Companies," an entity that does not exist, instead of the actual owner, Tresco Paving Corporation. The Commission unanimously voted to deny completeness and therefore could not review the plan.
In subsequent Old Business discussion about the Tresco lot consolidation (parcels 57-04-00-0-008, -180, -181, -182, -183, -184), Solicitor Thomas advised that Plant Road (Tax Map Parcel No. 57-04-00-0-184), currently owned by Damimo Storage, must be conveyed by deed to Tresco Paving Corporation and a recorded easement provided to prevent landlocking of parcel 57-04-00-0-005. The Commission listed plan corrections including labeling R/W dimensions, showing water sources (public vs. private), and adding a specific note about an existing wall that may encroach and can be removed at owner discretion. The Commission recorded a unanimous vote to deny completeness of Tresco's application.
