Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Doctor Harvey Awards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission selects Stokes residence for Doctor Harvey Award; gives honorable mention to 1762 Irving
Summary
The Historic Landmarks Commission chose the Stokes residence (estimated $15,880 in work) as the residential Doctor Harvey Award winner and awarded an honorable mention to the 1762 Irving property; commissioners debated whether paint‑focused projects met award criteria.
Get email alerts on the Doctor Harvey Awards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its April 15 meeting the Historic Landmarks Commission selected the Stokes residence (the $15,880 project at 16th and Grand) for the residential Doctor Harvey Award and gave an honorable mention to the 1762 Irving property.
Staff presented four nominations (three residential, one commercial — the Astor Building) and commissioners discussed whether paint‑focused or long‑running projects should qualify. President Burns said he thought the award should recognize a recent, substantial project rather than a paint job: "I'm not excited by giving the Harvey award for a paint job," he said, urging the commission to focus on significant restoration work.
Commissioners highlighted the scale of work at the Stokes residence — porch, deck and lower‑level improvements and other restoration beyond paint — and several commissioners moved and seconded the nomination. The motion to give the residential Doctor Harvey Award to the Stokes residence carried; commissioners also moved to give an honorable mention to 1762 Irving to recognize restoration and a replacement historic window. Commissioner Ross recorded an abstention on the honorable‑mention motion.
Staff said the awards will be presented at the City Council meeting on May 5 and that recipients will be contacted to attend.
Why it matters: The Doctor Harvey Awards are a local recognition program that highlights notable preservation work; commissioners’ debate about scope — paint versus substantial restoration — illustrates how the commission signals standards for future nominations and community expectations for preservation quality.
