Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Armory Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews Armory Hall design changes, favors darker metal contrast over sandstone
Summary
City staff and architects showed revised Armory Hall designs proposing darker metal (likely copper) for new additions, altered bay openings, and a copper roof option to distinguish new work from historic fabric; council broadly supported the more conservative Hopkins façade approach while asking that Historic Preservation Commission review remain part of the land‑use process.
City of Aspen staff and project architects presented updated designs for the Armory Hall adaptive‑reuse project and asked the council for direction on facade materials and site planning. Jen Phelan, the city’s development manager, said the team had revised the material palette to create clearer contrast between the historic armory and proposed additions, recommending a darker, warm metal — “in this case, we’re at this point assuming copper” — to differentiate new work from the existing sandstone and historic elements.
Todd Kennedy of CCY Architects described alternatives that limit impacts to historic material to Bays 2 and 5, wrap glass at Bay 5 to open the building onto Connor Park, and add skylights to improve interior daylighting. Kennedy said the copper roof choice is informed by the building’s varied historic roofs and by durability: “A metal roof will help with the building’s long term resiliency and we think ties to the building’s history as a metal roof in the past.” Council members asked for Historic Preservation Commission review and emphasized preserving the building’s character even while enabling a viable food‑hall operation; several members favored the more conservative Hopkins façade rendering shown in the packet.
The presentation and follow‑up questions framed the façade decision as both an aesthetic and regulatory issue: staff noted that HPC review is scheduled as part of the land‑use application and that the team will show how the proposal meets applicable guidelines while acknowledging guidelines sometimes conflict. The council’s direction on material palette and the amended Hopkins façade will be incorporated into the February land‑use submittal if council affirms the teams’ recommended approach.
