Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board recommends denying front-yard synthetic-turf variance for 1460 South Treasure Drive
Summary
The North Bay Village Planning & Zoning Board recommended denying a variance that would have allowed synthetic turf to cover 100% of the front-yard plantable area at 1460 South Treasure Drive, citing code criteria and the recent ordinance change that prohibits front-yard turf; staff noted the owner submitted a doctor's note citing severe allergies.
The Planning & Zoning Board on Thursday recommended denying a variance that would have allowed synthetic turf to remain across the entire front-yard planting area at 1460 South Treasure Drive.
Staff analyst Sylvia told the board the house was cited in December 2023 for installing turf without a permit and that a building permit application followed in April 2024 while the village was amending its synthetic-turf rules. "Mister Marlow, the property owner, has, stated, repeatedly that it's due to severe allergies to grass," Sylvia said, and staff said the owner provided a doctor's note. Staff also said recent code changes now prohibit synthetic turf in front yards and that, under the municipal code, the turf installation as-built exceeds prior front-yard allowances.
Board members pressed legal and policy questions about whether an owner's medical condition constitutes the kind of property-based hardship variance criteria require. Village counsel advised the board that the legal "hardship" standard focuses on unique conditions of the land or structure rather than an owner's health; staff characterized this as an accommodation rather than a property hardship.
Code-enforcement staff reported the case has accrued fines since April 2024 and estimated the outstanding amount at about $91,000. "We've reached our the endpoint of this," a code-enforcement representative said, describing the typical next step of asking the magistrate either to cap fines or to permit a final compliance window before recording a lien.
Several members suggested limiting any accommodation to the current owner, so the variance would expire upon sale, or conditioning approval on replacement with an approved alternative groundcover. After discussion, a motion to recommend denial passed on a roll call.
The planning board's recommendation is advisory; the final decision will be made by the village commission at a future meeting. The code-enforcement case and permit application remain active, and staff noted fines may be mitigated if the property comes into compliance before magistrate action.
