Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and advocates press council over Flock camera surveillance and data safeguards
Summary
Multiple residents and community groups demanded more public transparency and an open forum on Flock camera use; speakers raised concerns about privacy, data security, audit frequency and oversight.
A stream of public commenters used the July 30 council meeting to demand more transparency about the city’s contract with Flock cameras and broader surveillance practices.
Speakers — community organizers, neighborhood residents and privacy advocates — said audits and reporting are too infrequent and raised cybersecurity concerns about cloud storage and Bluetooth receivers. “These cameras facilitate mass surveillance,” one speaker said, urging another public forum with Fresno Police Department leadership. Several participants said they felt intimidated at a prior FPD community meeting because of heavy officer presence and asked for another session with fuller community participation.
Councilmembers acknowledged the concerns and said they would consider additional public sessions, audit transparency and procurement oversight. Mayor and staff said they favor careful review but noted the department has cited camera usefulness for specific investigations; opponents urged the council to revisit the contract, audit practices and community oversight before expanding camera deployments.
