Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bob Allen Parking Sup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves five‑year off‑site parking plan for Bob Allen Ford after debate over term length
Summary
After a prolonged discussion about framework policy and the appropriate length of a special use permit, the Planning Commission approved a five‑year SUP allowing a 48‑stall off‑site parking lot to support a nearby fleet maintenance facility; staff had recommended three years but commissioners opted for a compromise.
Get email alerts on the Bob Allen Parking Sup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning Commission approved a special use permit allowing Bob Allen Ford to build a 48‑stall off‑site parking lot to support its fleet maintenance facility at the southeast corner of 91st and Metcalf Avenue, voting 9–0 on a five‑year term after discussing whether a three‑ or ten‑year permit would be appropriate.
Staff described the site as an underused vacant parcel and argued for a three‑year permit so the city could preserve flexibility for Framework OP and future redevelopment; staff also noted the proposal would be fenced and landscaped and would serve the fleet center directly. Applicant counsel Greg Musil and company representatives said the lot is a needed infill parking resource for the fleet center and that building a paved lot represented a substantial investment (he estimated roughly $500,000–$600,000) that is not reasonably amortized over three years. "It is unreasonable to ask an applicant to try to amortize $500,000 or $600,000 over 3 years," Musil said.
Commissioners debated the balance between Framework OP goals (to reduce auto‑oriented uses in that corridor) and pragmatic needs for the fleet operation. Several commissioners said three years was short given construction costs and local market realities; others argued that Framework OP is an important long‑term guide and recommended a shorter initial term. After back‑and‑forth, the commission adopted a five‑year term with stipulations A–E; the motion passed 9–0. The item will proceed to City Council on Aug. 3 for consideration.
The applicant said it would accept a 10‑year permit if necessary, but agreed to the five‑year compromise and will proceed with required site improvements and landscaping.
