Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civil Liberties topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legislature rejects 'responsible public protest' resolution after lengthy debate over free speech and enforcement
Summary
A proposed resolution urging ‘responsible’ protest conduct and endorsing local crowd‑management guidelines failed 5–7 after extended debate over whether the legislature should endorse sheriff, city or university policies and concerns it might chill protest activity.
Rich John introduced Resolution M to urge responsible public protest and to endorse existing crowd‑management guidelines from local law enforcement; the measure prompted an extended discussion about free expression, fairness and whether the legislature should weigh in on non‑legislative policies.
Supporters described the resolution as an informational endorsement of existing sheriff and city policies designed to protect public safety and clarify expectations. Critics, including Amanda Champion and several other legislators, said the measure could be read as discouraging civil disobedience and risked appearing to monitor dissent; they argued it was not the legislature’s role to adopt operational policing guidance. An amendment removing a reference to Cornell University’s expressive activity policy was included, but ultimately the motion failed on a roll call vote, 5 in favor and 7 opposed.
The debate highlighted tensions between protecting the right to protest and ensuring public safety; several members suggested further committee discussion and better public‑facing guidance rather than a legislature endorsement.
