Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sperry trustees approve rezoning of about 7.12 acres near SH-11 on 4-1 vote

Board of Trustees of the Town of Sperry · May 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a May 7 special meeting the Sperry Board of Trustees approved Rezoning Application Z-2026-03 to change roughly 7.12 acres near West 103rd St. North and State Highway 11 from Residential (R) to Commercial High Intensity (CH); the motion passed 4-1 with Trustee Gary Callahan opposed.

The Sperry Board of Trustees voted 4-1 on May 7 to approve Rezoning Application No. Z-2026-03, changing approximately 7.12 acres from Residential (R) to Commercial High Intensity (CH) for property located generally north and south of West 103rd Street North, about one-quarter mile west of State Highway 11 in Tulsa County. Mayor Robert Morton moved the motion and Trustee Patrick McCotter seconded it; Trustees David Cassidy, Patrick McCotter, Melody Anderson and Mayor Morton voted yes, and Trustee Gary Callahan voted no.

According to the minutes, the parcel is described as being in Section 14, Township 21 North, Range 12 East and containing approximately 7.12 acres, more or less. The board’s action was taken at a special meeting called to order by Mayor Morton at 6:10 p.m.; the meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. The minutes record that they were later approved by the board on May 14, 2026, and the document includes an attestation by attorney Jeff Stephens "approved as to form."

The approval formally changes the zoning classification for the identified property from residential to a commercial high-intensity designation. The minutes do not record any supporting staff report text, conditions, or detailed findings in this document, and they do not identify specific development proposals tied to the rezoning. The record also does not show any motion amendments or a roll-call rationale beyond the recorded yes/no votes.

Next steps and any required ordinance enactment, appeal period, or further public hearings are not specified in the minutes excerpt provided. The trustees recorded no absences and completed the meeting in roughly ten minutes.