Commission debates adding 'interpretation' and people–place language to ordinance

Commissioners spent significant time discussing how the commission's ordinance should define its purpose and duties, particularly whether to add language explicitly authorizing interpretation (for example, signage and storytelling) and references to people or places.

One member asked whether interpretation belongs within the commission's scope, noting that interpretive signs and projects might fit under preservation activities: "So interpretation doesn't...and so my question is, is that in the realm of the historical society?" Multiple members recommended drafting language that parallels National Register criteria to recognize people–place interactions and to avoid stepping on the Historical Society's responsibilities. The group agreed to prepare a draft purpose statement for review at the next meeting and to focus on purpose language first before substantially editing duties.

Commissioners emphasized the need for clarity to avoid mission creep while retaining flexibility to tell local stories that aren't strictly 'brick and mortar.' Staff volunteered to draft sample language for discussion.