Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Invasive Plants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council pauses invasive-bamboo ban to resolve enforcement and homeowner concerns
Summary
Sponsors said CB72 is intended to implement state authorization to regulate invasive bamboo; councilmembers, DPIE and public commenters flagged enforcement, definition and homeowner-cost issues and voted to hold the bill for further work.
Sponsor remarks framed CB72 as a local implementation of a state law that gave counties authority to regulate invasive bamboo. The sponsor said the state authorization followed repeated neighbor complaints about bamboo spreading and the costs to control it, and acknowledged the bill must address existing bamboo stands and fairness for homeowners.
Office of Law found the draft in improper legislative form but noted no legal impediment to enactment. DPIE and the County Executive's Office asked for more time to resolve implementation details, including whether DPIE has inspectors with vegetation expertise, whether Department of Environment or soil conservation experts should be consulted, and how complaint-driven enforcement would operate equitably.
Members of the public and the Sierra Club supported regulation but urged clearer species definitions, a list of covered bamboo species, and resources for homeowners who unintentionally own invasive stands. Janet Gingold of the Sierra Club asked for higher fines for vendors who knowingly sell invasive bamboo and for lower fines and more assistance for homeowners already struggling with spread.
After discussion, the committee voted to hold the bill and asked sponsors to work with the administration and appropriate departments on definitions, enforcement resources, and homeowner protections.
