Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members debate nominating-committee power and eligibility rules; state nonprofit RCW cited at meeting
Summary
Attendees questioned whether a board-appointed nominating committee may exclude candidates from the ballot, citing Washington nonprofit law (RCW) and the council bylaws; the chair said members can override committee decisions and the dispute was placed on record for follow-up before the election.
During the candidate-nomination portion of the meeting, several members raised objections to the nominating committee's role in vetting applicants and potentially excluding candidates from the ballot.
One participant cited Washington nonprofit law (RCW) during the exchange and argued that the organization's bylaws require only membership and age to qualify for director candidacy. That speaker said the nominating committee's practice of vetting candidates could deny people the opportunity to be on the ballot if the committee rejects them after the nomination deadline.
Chair Diane Emerson responded that the nominating committee is a standard board practice, that the membership can override committee decisions by motion, and that rejected applicants could resubmit to a newly formed board. Other attendees pressed whether members had previously approved the nominating-committee process and whether the practice was transparent and fair. The council recorded the objections on the meeting record but did not change procedures at this session.
The exchange referenced RCW provisions (speakers cited RCW 24.03A.500 and RCW 24.03A.490 during discussion). The council did not take formal action to change the nomination timeline or committee authority at this meeting; members on record asked that the issue be noted and possibly addressed before the election process concludes.
