Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Heritage Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vashon council debate spotlights disputed Chamber endorsement behind heritage-sign vote
Summary
A motion to rescind the council's June endorsement of sign-code exemptions for heritage-trail signs opened a heated exchange over whether a Chamber of Commerce endorsement had been authorized — the council postponed a vote on this item to allow more information to surface.
Get email alerts on the Heritage Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Diane Emerson, president of the Vashon Maury Community Council, halted voting and moved the council to continue discussion on the heritage-trail signage controversy at a future meeting after members traded conflicting accounts of outreach and endorsements.
At the annual meeting on Nov. 21, Armin Yousefian moved to rescind the council's June 2024 resolution that had supported seeking King County sign-code exemptions for heritage-trail signs in Ellesport and Burton, arguing the earlier vote “was obtained after mistaken and misleading information was presented to the council” and that the Chamber of Commerce endorsement cited at the time had been authored and distributed without the chamber’s knowledge. "This misinformation may have influenced members' decisions... Therefore, the vote is unreliable," Yousefian said as he read his motion.
Steve Bergman, who made the original motion months earlier, countered that at the time he had received a letter from "Amy Dreyer from the Chamber of Commerce endorsing the project," and said he was saddened by what he called efforts to undermine the project with false claims. "These heritage trails are to build community," Bergman said, defending the proposal as unobtrusive and educational.
Victoria Barr and several other residents said the Chamber ultimately rescinded its endorsement when the letter turned out to have been issued without authorization and that many Burton business owners and residents reported they were unaware of the project. "The letter of endorsement from the Chamber of Commerce was rescinded by the Chamber of Commerce," Barr said, describing the rescission and businesses’ lack of notice as evidence the 29–13 vote may have been based on flawed information.
Council members did not vote on the rescission motion that night. Diane Emerson said the item will return to a future meeting when the board can present additional documentation and the community can continue the conversation.
The discussion produced petitions and canvass claims on both sides: proponents cited petitions and flyers distributed in Ellesport and Burton, while opponents reported about 220 signatures opposing the exemption and multiple residents who said they had not received notice. The council left the issue open for follow-up rather than taking immediate formal action.

