Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Crime Lab And Clearance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Memphis police and prosecutors cite evidence-processing gaps; call for local crime lab
Summary
Deputy Chief Sam Hines and DA representatives said evidence backlogs (ballistics, DNA) and low clearance rates hamper prosecutions. Officials urged pursuit of a local crime lab, noting current evidence is sent to Jackson, Tennessee, which delays cases.
Deputy Chief Sam Hines of the Memphis Police Department told the committee that officers are frustrated when violent offenders are arrested but later released on bond or otherwise returned to the street, and that delays in evidence processing contribute to case slowdowns and low clearance rates.
"We catch him, and a guy gets to walk out on his own reconnaissance there," Hines said, describing examples in which officers felt the bond or case resolution did not match the severity of the alleged crime. Hines listed hotspots and patterns (carjackings, repeat offenders, truck-stop areas) that trouble patrol officers.
Ernest Brooks, a senior policy advisor for the District Attorney's Office, told the committee Memphis does not have a local crime lab: DNA, ballistics and other evidence go to Jackson, Tennessee for processing, which delays prosecutions. He said federal, state and local funds would be needed to build capacity and urged community and political advocacy.
Leslie Taylor and others agreed a local crime lab could reduce waits for ballistics and lab results that currently stall trials and keep people in custody or out on extended supervision. Crime‑beat volunteers said ballistics and bodycam redaction delays were among the problems they identified in court-watch observations.
Next steps: Officials called for a coordinated funding effort to build a local crime lab and for continued monitoring of clearance rates as reforms and staffing changes proceed.
