Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Timekeeping topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves Time Clock Plus to digitize employee timekeeping

South Ogden City Council · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council approved Resolution 26-04 to contract with Time Clock Plus for employee time and attendance software. Staff cited payroll efficiencies, a one-time implementation fee of $10,500, an ongoing annual fee of $7,200, and estimated annual labor-related savings of about $17,000.

The South Ogden City Council on March 3 voted to approve Resolution 26-04, authorizing an agreement with Time Clock Plus to digitize employee timekeeping across departments.

Peter, a city staff member presenting the item, said the city's current payroll processing requires significant manual effort, particularly for recreation staff who frequently work offsite. He gave cost details: "The current minimum time that we're spending on payroll is about $1,100 in labor time every pay period. So that equates to about $29,000 a year," and staff estimated conservative payroll-related savings of about $680 per pay period (approximately $17,000 annually). The recommended vendor quoted a one-time implementation charge of $10,500 and an ongoing annual cost of $7,200 for up to 160 users.

Council members asked how part-time recreation employees would be verified and how approvers could access department reports. Peter said part-time employees will have employee credentials to log into the app and approvers will have dashboards for reporting; geofencing is available as an optional feature for on-site verification but is not required. After discussion the council moved, seconded and approved Resolution 26-04 on a roll-call vote; the transcript records recorded 'Yes' votes from Council members Stevens, Smythe, Howe and Peterson.