Commission raises infrastructure and parking questions as scenarios grow denser

As the group considered taller scenarios, multiple members asked whether existing water and sewer capacity and emergency response could support 6–8 story buildings. Nathan Davis said infrastructure capacity "will be considered as we move into the preferred scenario" and flagged that scenario testing will refine capacity planning. Commissioners noted elevator and code triggers — for example, buildings above four stories generally require elevators — and Tim Watkins from Wasatch County Regional Council noted that wood‑frame solutions typically cap out at about five stories before switching to steel and concrete, increasing costs.

Parking was likewise central to the discussion. Several participants preferred underground or structured parking to avoid surface lots that fragment city center fabric; staff noted parking demand calculations depend on unit bedroom mixes, transit access and potential shared parking strategies. Davis said the next iteration will show parking scaled to proposed densities and test whether shared public garages or developer‑provided structures are required for higher intensity scenarios.