Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Variance Setback topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves setback variance for Michael Stark at 7310 Stark Lane

Fairview Board of Zoning Appeals · July 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Fairview Board of Zoning Appeals approved a variance allowing a new house at 7310 Stark Lane to be sited closer to the existing residence than the CD4C code's 18-foot maximum front setback; approval included demolition and building-permit conditions.

The Fairview Board of Zoning Appeals voted July 28 to grant a front-setback variance for the property at 7310 Stark Lane, allowing the applicant to build the new residence near the existing house rather than meet the CD4C district's maximum 18-foot front setback. The motion to approve was moved and seconded and passed by roll call with Mister Mitchell, Mister Dwyer, Mister Anderson and Miss Hill voting "Aye."

Applicant Michael Stark told the board he had planned to replace the existing house and learned only after preparing to build that the property's zoning had changed. "It wasn't until we decided to finally pull the trigger and start building that we learned that the zoning for our property had changed," Stark said. Staff's written report, read by consulting planner Kevin Chastain, explained the parcel was rezoned to CD4C with the April 2 adoption of Fairview's new development code but remains in residential use; Chastain noted staff had placed two conditions on any approval: the property owner must submit a demolition permit for the existing residence and a building permit for the new home.

Board discussion centered on the seven variance standards, particularly whether the property's topography or other conditions created an exceptional hardship. One board member said a site visit convinced him that standard 1 (exceptional topography or other extraordinary condition) was satisfied despite staff's recommendation that standard not be met. Attorney Josh Hogan reminded the board that a variance "would run with the property," meaning any future owner could build to the approved setback. The board's approval was recorded with the stated conditions and will be reflected in the building-permit review if the applicant moves forward.