Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Data Center Moratorium topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Box Elder County adopts 180‑day moratorium on data centers after hours of public comment
Summary
The County Commission unanimously approved a 180‑day moratorium on data centers and associated power plants to allow development of zoning and review standards. Dozens of public commenters urged studies on water, power, health and transparency tied to the Stratos Project.
Box Elder County commissioners voted unanimously June 10 to adopt Ordinance No. 654, a 180‑day moratorium on data centers and data‑center power plants that halts new applications while the county drafts zoning and permitting standards.
Community Development Director Scott Lyons told the commission the moratorium will provide time to "review what codes and zoning will need to be in place," and County Attorney Stephen Hadfield said any application filed before adoption would proceed under prior rules. Commissioner Lee Perry moved to adopt the moratorium; Commissioner Boyd Bingham seconded and the motion carried on a 3–0 roll call vote.
The vote followed an extended public comment period focused on the proposed Stratos data‑center project. Speakers raised recurring concerns about water availability, power sources and environmental impacts. “Facts carry more weight than assumptions, evidence carries more weight than emotions, and transparency builds trust,” said Jack Stickney, a resident who urged officials to base decisions on scientific analysis.
Several residents described local water problems they said predate the Stratos proposal. Christine Williams of North Garland told commissioners her family relies on a poor‑quality well and was told they could not connect to a nearby culinary water system although a water line runs across the street; she said a required fire hydrant was not installed in her subdivision and her homeowner insurance increased "by more than $100 per month." Williams questioned permitting new wells to serve a data center while existing residents face shortages.
Other commenters asked how the facility would be powered (existing grid, gas turbines or other technologies); what cooling systems would require; whether water would be recycled; and how many permanent jobs would remain after construction. Miguel Durant asked whether the facility’s energy would rely on gas turbines that could affect air quality or on other sources that would introduce different risks.
Support and opposition emerged. Dave Hougaard argued for property‑owner rights and warned that restrictions could trigger lawsuits; others, including Carolyn Lenzie, urged the commission to extend the moratorium to at least 12 months and to adopt siting standards tied to water, power capacity and setbacks.
The commission also directed staff to explore related steps: Commissioner Perry moved that the County Attorney send a letter to the Utah Inland Port Authority asking that Box Elder County property be removed from the inland‑port inventory; that motion carried 3–0. Implementation: staff will draft code amendments and return them to the Planning Commission and County Commission for the statutory amendment process.
The meeting record shows no formal suspension of existing permits the county previously accepted; Hadfield clarified that completeness determinations made before the moratorium continue under the prior regulations.
