Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Hawthorne TIF despite residents' concerns over notice and floodplain
Summary
After hours of public comment from Arlington-area residents concerned about notice, floodplain mapping and traffic, the Shelby County Commission approved a tax-increment financing plan to fund infrastructure for the Hawthorne mixed-use development. Opponents pressed the commission to enforce recently adopted local community engagement guidelines.
The Shelby County Commission voted to approve a tax-increment financing (TIF) plan for the Hawthorne mixed‑use project in Arlington, clearing a path for county tax increment to fund roads and other infrastructure supporting the development. The resolution passed after commissioners rejected a motion to send the item back to committee; the county attorney advised the TIF met state-law agenda criteria for consideration.
Opposition from nearby residents centered on notice and environmental risk. Elizabeth McIntyre, who lives within the half‑mile radius the county uses for TIF outreach, told commissioners she and roughly 50 neighbors she surveyed had not received mailed notices and urged more study of an outdated floodplain map: "Moving forward with this development in a floodplain area, especially without proper studies, is negligent at the very best." Arlington officials and the applicant said they held multiple public meetings, provided sign‑in sheets and completed a traffic study; town representatives said the development increases projected property tax revenue and that some infrastructure changes — including an interchange — will address access and safety needs.
Commissioners split on whether local community engagement guidelines adopted in May should block the vote. Commissioner Brooks argued the county’s guidelines require community‑specific meetings and documentation: "These guidelines were created by resolution of this body and this body governs through resolutions." County attorneys and several colleagues responded that the item met the state statutory process for placement on the county agenda. After debate the commission approved the TIF, with proponents emphasizing infrastructure funding and opponents warning that questions over notice and flood risk remain.
The commission directed follow-up information and said staff will provide additional documentation on outreach and financial projections; the town and applicant also said they will continue coordination on traffic and flood‑risk mitigation.
