Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission approves Lindy Creek annexation, assigns Goose Creek RSF zoning

Goose Creek Planning Commission · August 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission approved annexation and a zoning map amendment for TMS 2440104023 on Lindy Creek Road, moving the parcel from Berkeley County R‑1 into the city and assigning Residential Single‑Family (RSF) zoning; staff said the request matches a prior June recommendation.

The Planning Commission voted to approve an annexation and zoning map amendment for a parcel identified as TMS 2440104023 on Lindy Creek Road, bringing the property into the city and assigning Residential Single‑Family (RSF) zoning. Vice Chairperson Heather Bird moved to approve the request; the motion was seconded and carried on a voice vote.

A staff presenter told the commission that the parcel is “currently zoned Berkeley County residential single family r 1 and are requesting, Goose Creek Residential Single family RSF.” The presenter said the same request was heard in June and recommended again after correcting an ordinance drafting issue: “Y'all previously heard this parcel in June… you voted, 6 0 to recommend approval. It had to come back because of an issue on the actual ordinance itself… it's the same exact request.”

The commission did not request additional conditions or amendments during the meeting. The staff presenter offered to read from the staff report if members wanted more detail; none requested further information before the vote. The transcript does not record a roll-call tally; the motion carried on a voice vote and the chair declared the motion carried.

Next steps were not specified in the meeting record. The transcript notes that the item had been recommended by the commission previously (June) and was reintroduced only to correct the ordinance language, with no change to the substance of the zoning request.