Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the TIF topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lakeland safety TIF approved by committee; plan emphasizes highway safety and jobs

Shelby County Board of Commissioners · October 23, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The County committee gave a favorable recommendation to a Lakeland 'safety TIF' aimed at Highway 70 traffic calming and a mixed‑use development, with presenters projecting tens of millions in county property tax revenue over 20 years; commissioners asked for specifics on incremental revenue and community meetings.

The county’s economic development committee moved a Lakeland safety TIF forward with a favorable recommendation after a presentation by Mayor Josh Roman on Oct. 23. The plan centers on making Highway 70 safer through traffic‑calming measures and building mixed‑use development that the city says will support jobs and school funding.

Roman said the project is expected to generate substantial tax revenue over 20 years and cited an estimate of roughly $47.7 million in county property tax at build‑out, with incremental county receipts (after debt service and allowances) of roughly $14.4 million presented in the briefing materials. He told commissioners the TIF boundary was expanded to include intersections on Highway 70 so the project could fund collector roads and traffic improvements.

Commissioners pressed for proof of community meetings within a 0.5‑mile radius; Lakeland officials said the developer held a March 2024 meeting that had two attendees and that mailed notice was distributed for planning and IDB approvals. Commissioners also asked about affordable housing (the town attorney said there will be no affordable housing requirement in this TIF) and how much of the increment will go to county coffers versus debt service. The committee approved the item with seven yes votes and one abstention.

What’s next: The item goes to the full commission; staff said they would provide more detailed economic‑analysis breakdowns and meeting documentation requested by commissioners.