Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reporting And Metrics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board asks for follow-up report as routes begin; staff outlines success measures
Summary
Board members requested staff return with performance reporting roughly 15 months after program start; staff said success would be judged by route persistence into year two, load factors and additional route development.
Get email alerts on the Reporting And Metrics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A board member moved to approve the program with a condition that staff return in about a year plus three months with a performance report showing what worked and what did not. The member framed the request as an accountability measure tied to the limited TERS 2 fund balance.
Staff said measures of success will include whether routes continue into year two, load factors (staff referenced 70%+ targets for airlines), and whether additional routes are subsequently developed. "If we support 10 routes and 7 of those routes are still being served out at TKI in year 2, I would argue that's a pretty successful measure," one staff member said. The board accepted the reporting caveat before approving the item.
