Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates using tourism tax on infrastructure — "Portland Loo" suggested
Summary
Members discussed whether leftover transient lodging tax dollars should fund advertising or tangible infrastructure like public restrooms; one member suggested using the $41,747 remainder to install a Portland-style restroom if legally allowable.
During deliberations over the Promote Astoria fund, several committee members questioned whether transient lodging tax dollars should focus primarily on advertising or be used for community improvements that directly affect residents and visitors.
One member described a practical alternative: "If we can double dip on this money in a way that still fits the requirements, that'd be great," and suggested the committee consider a public restroom as an example. Staff cautioned that any such use would require a legal review to determine whether it fits the tourism nexus required by statute and would need a formal project proposal and cost estimate.
Supporters of keeping the funding focused on LCTC and advertising said marketing helps bring off-season visitors and supports the broader tourism economy; critics said the city should consider projects that produce tangible local benefits. The committee did not reallocate the remainder to an infrastructure project at this meeting but noted the idea for future consideration.
