Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Page County planners outline stricter short-term rental rules; registry and local contact required

Page County Planning Commission · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners discussed a comprehensive checklist for short-term rental regulation, showing consensus on a non-public registry, a required local contact and parking and occupancy limits; commissioners split on a proposed two-year ownership minimum and other limits.

The Planning Commission devoted part of its May 12 meeting to an extensive review of proposed zoning changes governing short-term rentals (STRs). Commissioner Ken Johnson presented a checklist intended to move debate away from whether STRs are ‘‘good or bad’’ and toward how the county safeguards neighborhood stability, housing availability and rural character.

Commissioners and staff agreed on a set of baseline tools: a mandatory county registry (not publicly posted), a required local point of contact for complaints, concept-plan requirements for large or multi-unit listings, parking standards tied to dwelling size and enforcement provisions including escalating fines. "A registry is a done deal," said Tracy Clatterbuck, summarizing staff and attorney guidance; she also noted the registry should not be a public document per the County Attorney's suggestion.

Commissioners did not reach consensus on every item. A two-year ownership rule for new STRs drew mixed reactions—Grech, Johnson and Davis expressed support while Turner and Chairman Burner opposed it. Commissioners also discussed whether non-owner-occupied rentals should be limited in platted subdivisions and whether special-use permit triggers should apply for properties accessed by private lanes serving multiple dwellings. Staff will draft two alternative ordinance proposals reflecting Board direction for next review.

Provenance: discussion recorded SEG 008 through SEG 010.