Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise And Permit Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Page County planners confront speedway amendment as neighbors demand enforceable noise limits
Summary
Residents urged the Page County Planning Commission to halt any expansion of the Shenandoah Speedway permits until the track demonstrates compliance and meaningful mitigation; commissioners debated the need for updated noise analysis and clearer, enforceable permit language.
Get email alerts on the Noise And Permit Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Page County Planning Commission spent the bulk of its May 12 meeting weighing a request by Shenandoah Speedway to expand event days and operating hours and to raise allowable sound levels. Neighbors packed the Board of Supervisors room to press the commission for enforceable limits and for either an updated noise study or clear mitigation measures such as walls and monitoring before any expansion is considered.
"This SUP amendment should be completely tabled until the Speedway can demonstrate consistent record of compliance that does not violate our rights as neighbors," said Hilary Irons, a property owner on Mill Run Road, summarizing a common request from the public. Residents and physicians who live within sight or hearing distance of the track described repeated, sustained peaks they measured in the 60–90 dB range and said the county’s current permit language is not being enforced.
Staff presented draft amendment language prepared with the County Attorney and noted the applicant has asked for up to 50 event days and longer hours; commissioners and residents disputed how the existing permits should be counted and enforced. "My understanding is the current SUPs are difficult to enforce in their present form," said Commissioner Catherine Grech, who called for clarity about what mitigation would be required before authorizing higher noise or more events. Commissioner Ken Johnson said the commission needs professional advice on noise monitoring and enforcement options—he asked whether the county should seek an expert briefing on measurement methodology and what would make a standard enforceable.
No final vote was taken on the Speedway amendment. Staff said they will ask the applicant whether he will provide an updated noise study; if not, staff will consult the County Administrator and the County Attorney about next steps. Several residents urged the commission to resolve compliance issues before considering any expansion; commissioners indicated they would consider both the legal enforceability of permit language and the technical feasibility of mitigation measures such as sound barriers or different monitoring protocols.
Provenance: related discussion appears beginning SEG 011 and the public comment and exchange about enforcement and mitigation continues through SEG 015.
